Hehe, not that it will make any difference, but I figured someone with such a blunt comment would have the guts to reveal their identity in addition to their opinion.
That probably has to do with two things: first, Steinruck’s design is far better than mine; second, mine has a tendency to produce some invalid HTML (and/or CSS) which is possibly a requirement in order for me to get into the larger CSS galleries.
Nice design, but the typography is TERRIBLE
Look at that nav for god’s sake
August 25th, 2005 at 4:15 pm
Hehe, not that it will make any difference, but I figured someone with such a blunt comment would have the guts to reveal their identity in addition to their opinion.
August 25th, 2005 at 4:17 pm
I should make a design worthy of a CSS gallery site like that. :D
August 25th, 2005 at 10:25 pm
Cool beans, Jona. Now, what the heck is that site. I saw your banner there but it wasn’t clear to me what it was about.
August 26th, 2005 at 6:15 pm
It’s a CSS gallery, like Stylegala, CSS Beauty, etc.
August 26th, 2005 at 7:13 pm
(oops, forgot to close the CSS Beauty link, therefore making your page invalid HTML, Jona. :P)
August 26th, 2005 at 7:14 pm
It’s interesting that http://www.steinruckdesign.com/ <he got into StyleGala, CssBeauty, etc….but you only got into CSS Drive?
August 29th, 2005 at 1:42 pm
That probably has to do with two things: first, Steinruck’s design is far better than mine; second, mine has a tendency to produce some invalid HTML (and/or CSS) which is possibly a requirement in order for me to get into the larger CSS galleries.
August 29th, 2005 at 1:51 pm
I liked your previous design better. :-)
August 29th, 2005 at 3:58 pm
I’ve gotten that from a few people. I appreciate those comments, because they help shape the new design coming November 1st. :)
August 29th, 2005 at 4:14 pm