Comments on: JavaScript’s Bad Name http://slightlyremarkable.com/blog/2006/07/29/javascripts-bad-name/ Jonathan Fenocchi's personal weblog Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:15:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Wayne http://slightlyremarkable.com/blog/2006/07/29/javascripts-bad-name/comment-page-1/#comment-3494 Wayne Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:48:44 +0000 http://www.slightlyremarkable.com/2006/07/javascripts-bad-name#comment-3494 If they suggest to disabling JavaScript, why do their pages use it? Or have I missed the point? If they suggest to disabling JavaScript, why do their pages use it? Or have I missed the point?

]]> By: Jona http://slightlyremarkable.com/blog/2006/07/29/javascripts-bad-name/comment-page-1/#comment-3173 Jona Fri, 01 Sep 2006 04:08:43 +0000 http://www.slightlyremarkable.com/2006/07/javascripts-bad-name#comment-3173 Haha, thanks for the well-coined analogy, Reilly! I'm glad you enjoyed my Ajax articles. Haha, thanks for the well-coined analogy, Reilly! I’m glad you enjoyed my Ajax articles.

]]> By: Reilly Hale http://slightlyremarkable.com/blog/2006/07/29/javascripts-bad-name/comment-page-1/#comment-3164 Reilly Hale Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:53:07 +0000 http://www.slightlyremarkable.com/2006/07/javascripts-bad-name#comment-3164 The uninformed suggestion by News.com to disable JavaScript to avoid possible security problems is about as logical as telling readers to remove the pockets from their jeans to prevent pickpocketing. Reilly P.S., Enjoyed the AJAX articles you wrote. The uninformed suggestion by News.com to disable JavaScript to avoid possible security problems is about as logical as telling readers to remove the pockets from their jeans to prevent pickpocketing.

Reilly

P.S., Enjoyed the AJAX articles you wrote.

]]> By: Anthony Brewitt http://slightlyremarkable.com/blog/2006/07/29/javascripts-bad-name/comment-page-1/#comment-2985 Anthony Brewitt Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:39:52 +0000 http://www.slightlyremarkable.com/2006/07/javascripts-bad-name#comment-2985 I couldnt agree more with your rant; that article is discraceful! I couldnt agree more with your rant; that article is discraceful!

]]> By: Mike Cherim http://slightlyremarkable.com/blog/2006/07/29/javascripts-bad-name/comment-page-1/#comment-2656 Mike Cherim Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:55:30 +0000 http://www.slightlyremarkable.com/2006/07/javascripts-bad-name#comment-2656 It's much like John Dvorak's foolish <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1987181,00.asp" rel="nofollow">Why CSS Bugs Me</a> article. Foolishness, Live! It’s much like John Dvorak’s foolish Why CSS Bugs Me article. Foolishness, Live!

]]>