<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global What?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://slightlyremarkable.com/blog/2008/12/10/global-what/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://slightlyremarkable.com/blog/2008/12/10/global-what/</link>
	<description>Jonathan Fenocchi's personal weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:15:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jona</title>
		<link>http://slightlyremarkable.com/blog/2008/12/10/global-what/comment-page-1/#comment-56503</link>
		<dc:creator>Jona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slightlyremarkable.com/blog/2008/12/10/global-what/#comment-56503</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

Yes, these are indeed my foolhardy words. But, that is all they are: words.

I&#039;d be interested in seeing your site, if you feel comfortable sharing it. I&#039;m always interested in seeing the work of others -- and don&#039;t worry about the perpetual construction. Most Web designers seem to have that &quot;problem.&quot; ;-)

Regarding my &quot;argument,&quot; I wouldn&#039;t go so far as to say that snow in Houston is scientific evidence that global warming is a political fib. Without knowing me personally, I&#039;m sure the hyperbolic atmosphere of my blog entry is easily missed. My intention was not to generate argument -- although, believe me, I am quite aware of the fact that it could quite easily do so -- but, in light of the rather rare event, I simply chose to write about it. Harmless, wouldn&#039;t you agree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>Yes, these are indeed my foolhardy words. But, that is all they are: words.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested in seeing your site, if you feel comfortable sharing it. I&#8217;m always interested in seeing the work of others &#8212; and don&#8217;t worry about the perpetual construction. Most Web designers seem to have that &#8220;problem.&#8221; ;-)</p>
<p>Regarding my &#8220;argument,&#8221; I wouldn&#8217;t go so far as to say that snow in Houston is scientific evidence that global warming is a political fib. Without knowing me personally, I&#8217;m sure the hyperbolic atmosphere of my blog entry is easily missed. My intention was not to generate argument &#8212; although, believe me, I am quite aware of the fact that it could quite easily do so &#8212; but, in light of the rather rare event, I simply chose to write about it. Harmless, wouldn&#8217;t you agree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david kohler</title>
		<link>http://slightlyremarkable.com/blog/2008/12/10/global-what/comment-page-1/#comment-56439</link>
		<dc:creator>david kohler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slightlyremarkable.com/blog/2008/12/10/global-what/#comment-56439</guid>
		<description>Am I to understand that these are your words?   Interesting site and in some respects
I can relate to what you&#039;ve done ( with the site ).   I have my own which is in forever
development but I won&#039;t give its address.

As for the argument posed, I could deliver a blistering commentary on it but I see no point in doing so.    In short, though. I can say it is much too superficial to be offered in
an academic debate or formal disputation.

Incidentally, I live in San Antonio and experienced a heavy snowfall in the early 80&#039;s which remained on the ground for about two weeks and broke a 100 year mean.   That
event as stark as it was ( and fun ) has no meaning, whatever, in global warming</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I to understand that these are your words?   Interesting site and in some respects<br />
I can relate to what you&#8217;ve done ( with the site ).   I have my own which is in forever<br />
development but I won&#8217;t give its address.</p>
<p>As for the argument posed, I could deliver a blistering commentary on it but I see no point in doing so.    In short, though. I can say it is much too superficial to be offered in<br />
an academic debate or formal disputation.</p>
<p>Incidentally, I live in San Antonio and experienced a heavy snowfall in the early 80&#8217;s which remained on the ground for about two weeks and broke a 100 year mean.   That<br />
event as stark as it was ( and fun ) has no meaning, whatever, in global warming</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

